![]() Not having used this camera before, (my GX680 does it for me) I would have thought that the movement would have been smooth and predictable, but as I am suspicious I think it is 'falling off the end' of a gear or something. there is what I would call normal resistance while advancing the film, then when the lever gets almost to the focus knob, it clicks free of film advance, and haphazardly pushes to end of travel. When advancing film, the cocking lever gets all the way forward and then at last 10% of stroke, 'breaks free' i.e. (so I am suspicious of internal state of camera) ![]() In trial III, the intestinal parameters investigated were not different between Y and C.Hi there, question to RZ67 pro ii users out there, can you verify that this is normal for camera Ĭontext: When cocking lever: Film advances fine, mirror is lowered, shutter is cocked, but I am suspicious about the gears etc, as the focus rail of the camera appears to be missing a tooth, it is periodically notchy and clunks through to next part of travel. Treatment and time as well as treatment × time interactions were detectable for most of the parameters studied, but a distinct immunomodulatory effect of Y was not consistently identifiable and performance did not improve. Feed intake was identical in the Y-a and Y-b groups and data subsets were accordingly pooled. Pigs fed 0.03% Y for 2 weeks prior to slaughter were compared with the C group. In a third trial, fattened pigs were used for morphological and immunohistochemical studies (IgM and IgA as well as CD and CD T cells) in ileal epithelium. Oxidative stress was monitored by recording reactive oxygen metabolites (ROM) and total antioxidant capacity. Immune status was surveyed by determining phagocytic activity and oxidative burst of neutrophils and blood concentrations of haptoglobin (Hp), and immunoglobulin (Ig) G and A. Y-r received the amount of feed consumed by C. Based on earlier observations that Y may increase feed intake, two treatment groups, Y-a (fed ad libitum) and Y-r (fed restrictively) were studied in comparison with a control group (C) in both trials. ![]() ![]() Potential immunomodulatory effects of a cell wall extract from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Y Antaferm MG) were tested in pigs: in trial I, 0.03% Y and in trial II 0.3% Y was used. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |